Repost.Us

Showing posts with label Erotica scandal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Erotica scandal. Show all posts

Thursday, October 17, 2013

Self-Published Erotica Removed! But 50 SHADES is Still There #Erotica #CensorshipSucks #Oct #ASMSG




Here's the sensationalized headline that rocked the UK and spawned a massive ban on self-published erotic ebooks:

"WH Smith's vile trade in online rape porn: Bookseller apologises after sales of sick ebooks are revealed"



Unless you've been hiding under a rock and have no clue about what's been taking place in the world of publishing, you have probably heard or seen news headlines like this:

"Self-Published Erotica is Being Singled Out For Sweeping Deletions From Major eBookstores"


"Kobo’s Purge of Self-Pub eBooks has Spread to New Zealand, Australia"


Here's a somewhat slanted view of this highly editorialized-sensationalized media scare:


"Online Booksellers Are Increasingly Afraid of Selling Smut"


Now, it is interesting to look at the heated debates on The Digital Reader, mostly from Indies, Author-Publishers.  And then take a look at Joe Garde's writeup, which raises all kinds of valid questions about the slippery slope of censorship, but completely misses the mark on other issues.

What isn't really clear is the fact that ALL SELF PUBLISHED EROTICA is now suspect, and a target for removal in the UK, and the US, regardless of whether or not it touches on taboo subject matter like incest or bestiality (that's what the scare was all about to begin with).

Well, if online booksellers are afraid of selling smut, and the issue is erotic content, which is what they targeted by removing ALL SELF-PUBLISHED erotic content, then why does WH Smith have all these books available from major publishers:  

WH Smith still carries....
LOLITA
50 SHADES OF GREY
STORY OF O
An ENTIRE SECTION OF EROTICA
An ENTIRE SECTION OF EROTIC ROMANCE

There's not a single self-published title left in their website to compete with any of the hundreds of erotic fiction novels available from major publishing companies.  That's quite a convenient boon to major publishers whose erotic fiction market was being steadily eroded away by a large number of popular self-published titles.  I imagine they are very pleased to have all their competition removed, and just in time for the holiday internet book buying craze valued in HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS.

There's nothing remotely suspicious about that, is there?  

According to The Guardian and Library Journal, major publishers are selling erotic fiction hand over fist, and scrambling to get long dead back-lists of erotica back into circulation.

http://www.theguardian.com/books/2013/aug/02/erotic-fiction-ebook-bestseller-chart-rowling
http://reviews.libraryjournal.com/2013/02/books/genre-fiction/erotica-full-frontal-shelving-genre-spotlight/

And Kobo claims, "We want to protect the reputation of self-publishing as a whole." The company moved lightning fast to accomodate WH Smith's demands for self-published erotica removal.  ALL OF KOBO'S SELF-PUBLISHED EROTICA HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THEIR UK WEBSITE.  It seems the only thing they have "protected" is their retail relationship with WH Smith.

But, Kobo UK still carries....
(Only people in the UK can see the Kobo UK site--so I have provided the screenshots)


LOLITA




50 SHADES OF GREY



 STORY OF O




AN ENTIRE SECTION OF EROTICA




AN ENTIRE SECTION OF EROTIC ROMANCE



So, while Joe Garde asserts that online booksellers are increasingly afraid of selling erotica, they are still doing a brisk trade in TRADITIONALLY PUBLISHED erotica, without all those pesky self-published titles mucking up the pages and stealing market share.

How very convenient for major publishers.

One might start to wonder what resources might lie behind this Machiavellian movement to scour the shelves of self-published erotica.  Logically, to analyze a situation like this, you would look at who stands to benefit most from this act.  Follow the money trail.

Though I may seem to imply people have a right to publish erotic content, that right doesn't exist.  But can online booksellers legally ban one group of people from publishing erotic content, while allowing another group?  

I am no lawyer, but my eyes see discrimination, widespread discrimination.

ALL SELF PUBLISHED EROTICA IS BEING REMOVED IN THE UK, AND IN SOME CASES, THE USA, BY AT LEAST TWO RETAILERS.

You can sit around and quote laws and whip out legal dictionaries and whatever. None of that changes the plain truth that self-published erotica is being discriminated against, and this is probably only the beginning.  Will other retailers follow suit?

Is this a form of discrimination that can be sued for? Probably not.

But it should be.

Is this a form of discrimination against one’s rights? Not exactly, no.

But its still discrimination.

I see no debate over the fact this is a form of discrimination. The debate is, what the hell can and should be done about it, if anything?

Is it time for an Erotic Author-Publishers Union?  Could Author-Publishers create a united front, and start amassing clout and leverage in the world of publishing and distribution?

I know quite a few erotic authors, and I can say from experience, organizing them is like trying to herd cats (sweet, lovable, affectionate cats nothing derogatory here).

And though my own books are classified as paranormal romance and paranormal thriller, I can't help but wonder what is an Author-Publisher to do when their books are removed from retail sale, their livelihoods deleted from servers?

"Do not go gentle into that good night ... Rage, rage against the dying of the light." ~ Dylan Thomas

Repost.Us